科学家在德国发现2.9亿年前的化石呕吐物,通过CT扫描分析揭示了三种小型爬行动物的骨骼,确认这是已知最古老的陆地生态系统反刍化石,为了解远古捕食者行为提供了重要证据。
Vomit is gross—but 290-million-year-old vomit is a scientific marvel. Fossils are remarkable for their ability to viscerally connect us with long-lost life. The bulk of a Tyrannosaurus rex skull, the biting point of a shark tooth, the startling familiarity of a hominin footprint—and then there’s the charm inherent to any sample of regurgitalite, the paleontological term for fossilized vomit. Okay, charm might be a stretch, but to the right scientist, the rare finds are “little treasures,” says Arnaud Rebillard, a Ph.D. candidate in paleontology at the Natural History Museum of Berlin.
Consider the regurgitalite that’s the focus of research that Rebillard published on January 30 in Scientific Reports—the oldest known regurgitalite from a terrestrial ecosystem. Found in 2021, the specimen comes from a 290-million-year-old German site called Bromacker. Over a century of excavation, paleontologists have glimpsed a valley full of conifers that were apparently teeming with vegetarians, says Amy Henrici, a retired Carnegie Museum of Natural History paleontology collection manager, who was not involved in the new research.
Amid the loose fossils and remarkably preserved skeletons that characterize the site, the regurgitalite was uninspiring—until, that is, the fossil cleaning process and a computed tomography (CT) scan offered a clearer view. That process digitally extracted a cluster of 41 small bones that turned out to belong to three separate species: two small reptiles and a larger reptilelike animal. “This was clearly something that was eaten and then ejected from an animal,” Rebillard says.
The next questions were obvious: Which end did the fossil hail from, and what kind of animal expelled it? The most famous counterparts of regurgitalites are coprolites, or fossilized feces. (There are also gastrolites and cololites, which preserve a digestive tract’s contents in place in the stomach and intestines, respectively. Together these types of fossils are known as bromalites.) Distinguishing between coprolites and regurgitalites is “actually not super obvious all the time,” Rebillard says.
In this case, two pieces of evidence led Rebillard and his colleagues to conclude that the remnants had been vomited up: the leg bones of the largest prey animal remained connected to each other, suggesting that the limb had not traversed an entire digestive system. And the material directly surrounding the bones was low in phosphorus, which is plentiful in fossils that were once poop.
As to whose mess the scientists were pondering, there are two species known from the Bromacker site that would have been large enough to eat animals of the size found in the regurgitalite: Dimetrodon teutonis (a tiny member of a sail-backed group of animals that are often mistaken as dinosaurs) and Tambacarnifex unguifalcatus. Both contenders are synapsids, or members of a group that includes mammals and their extinct relatives, and would have measured around 20 to 30 inches long without their tail.
Whichever predator was involved, Henrici notes that the regurgitalite confirms that one of these animals snacked broadly on the smaller critters around it and could vomit up indigestible material, much as modern owls and Komodo dragons do today. For Rebillard, the fossil is also proof that all three prey species not only lived together in the same geologic time but also died together in the same week or even day.